Search It All

Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts

Monday, October 22, 2012

The foolery of being and voting Democrat



Have you ever wondered what the fight "across the aisle was all about? Let me explain it, without hiding the root cause. Our founding Fathers set this country as a Republic, not a Democracy. Let's first look at the definitions for both, then weigh the differences, and conclude with what this country is leaning towards, and what can be done to correct these problems.

Republic - a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.

Democratic - upholding or favouring democracy or the interests of the common people.

The contrast between the to is significant to say they are polar opposites, a republic is governed by the citizens, whereas a Democracy is the government holds the power and dictates what is best for the people, based on a Majority Rule.
This should go to show why our great nations founding fathers started the preamble of the constitution, "We the People," to enable us to stand up to our government, and stop the federal government from encroaching on our rights.

Originally, America allowed only Adults who fulfilled residency requirements, and paid taxes, the right to vote. Our republic should be opposed, to becoming the global champion of Democracy. What a democracy allows is anyone over the age of 18 to vote, this was exactly what our early leaders did not want to happen.

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." – John Adams (1814)

If this is a fact, then where did democracy come from? There are traces as far back as babylon, but it was first introduced in the Roman Empire, and we all know what happened to the Roman Empire, it crumbled. We aren't trying to follow in their footsteps, are we? I know I'm not!

Democrat - a person who believes in the political or social equality of all people.

Republican - an advocate or supporter of a republic.

According to the last two definitions, all Americans ARE republican. Otherwise, those of you who choose to be democrats, are terrorists, whose only objective is to destroy our republic, by getting rid of the constitution. Besides the fact that a democrat is not an advocate of the republic, he/she also DOES NOT support the republic. One can also conclude that democrats aren't the hard-working tax-payers, but are and represent those on welfare.

When I become president I plan to take away the right to vote unless you pay federal income taxes, and I pledge to be a champion of the constitution. As for President Obama, he hasn't repealed the patriot Act, which is unconstitutional, and has quadrupled the national Debt. He shouldn't be re-elected, because he is not a supporter of the republic!

Vote for freedom, elect Mitt Romney, at least he's American!

Monday, October 8, 2012

Dealt a bad hand - Oh Zee



I've been told that you'll neva be shit.
Cause what we already know,
is you ain't willing to do shows.
Your too busy runnin around
chasin twaff's and nasty hoes.
Compared to ya'll, I look like a pro
My Swagg is an aura that glows.
Halfstackin, Actin like you Mackin
with a Shotgun, thats loaded,
Ski Mask and you still ain't blastin
Today there is no time for relaxin'
My capital Returns over double
all while ya'll still askin
"how you doin it,"
If you really wanna know, I'm taxin
Because Time is our only Asset,
jus look at how fast its passin'
Limit the list, Cut off those
tellin lies and laughin,
but unable to take a simple
concept and try graspin.
They'll keep talkin trash
until they are handcuffed
and locked inside of a trash bin.

Oh Zee 10/8/2012

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The Ron Paul Grassroots "Delegate Lawsuit" Tossed, New Version Filed


The Ron Paul Grassroots "Delegate Lawsuit" Tossed, New Version Filed
Brian Doherty|Aug. 10, 2012 5:47 pm

The lawsuit filed by a Ron Paul grassroots activist lawyer charging the Republican National Committee (RNC) with various shenanigans against Ron Paul delegates and calling for the RNC to admit that no delegate is bound to vote for Romney was dismissed by U.S. District Judge David Carter this week.

Carter's order to dismiss.

Some relevant language from the order explaining why the Judge didn't think the suit worth going forward:

For example, Plaintiffs’ vague reference to “State Bylaws” gives this Court no inkling as to which of the 50 states and which of the millions of pages of bylaws Plaintiffs refer. Similarly, Plaintiffs’ use of the passive voice renders it impossible to discern who broke the bones of whom, who pointed a gun at whom, and whether any of the more than 100 Defendants were even involved. Finally, Plaintiffs’ vague allegations of voting ballot fraud occurring somewhere at sometime and apparently committed simultaneously by all “Defendants” lacks plausibility. While Plaintiffs make an oblique reference to a voting machine somewhere in Arizona, the lack of clarity in this allegation is insufficient to raise it to a level above mere speculation.Thus, this Court does not accept these allegations as true.

I wrote about that suit both right here at Reason and in the New York Times back in June.

The Paul campaign itself never embraced the suit or supported it--though Ron Paul himself didn't choose to condemn it either. Richard Gilbert, the lawyer who filed it, was ferocious in his insistence it was for the good of the delegates, and the honesty of the Republican primary and caucus process.

Finish Reading this Article here!



Delegates vs RNC - ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Ronald Reagan On The Holocaust Lie (1967)





Spielbergs Hoax The Last Days of The Big Lie




QUESTION THE HOLOCAUST!!
EVIDECE OF GAS CHAMBERS WERE NEVER FOUND!


Captain Zee

Dynastoned.com

The Hit Songs that the Radio Won't Play

White House.gov Press Office Feed

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom

Sports