Was Hitler Just A Pawn? - Officer Jack McLamb

I dunno? it's hard enough to get people off their butt nowadays. At least when you say the Name Hitler and Nazi it sure gets their attention. And now that Hitler is getting Good exposure all over the net, anyone serious enough to get involved in anything would be motivated enough to do more research on him.

When I first got the Revelation I was floored at how badly Hitler and the German people had been smeared and this really fired me up!

One thing that I do when arguing about Hitler is ask people if they knew he was an artist.Just about everyone repeats the lie that he was a washed up hack artist (and there's that abysmal movie with John Cusack,MAX,which depicts Hitler as a runny nosed scribbler).

When they go to the web and find out what an excellent artist He was,that can have a big impact.

If you can get people over the Hitler hurdle - they are OURS.NOW they see how the enemy works in all sphere's and are forever changed.We need to find the ways to make this easier,not avoid it!


Clean your hands, and start warning others!  We have work of his that needs to be done, according to his will!  Stand for the constitution, or fall by choosing!

www.oakraidersvoice.blogspot.com

Great Valentine's Day Offers!

The Ron Paul Grassroots "Delegate Lawsuit" Tossed, New Version Filed

The Ron Paul Grassroots "Delegate Lawsuit" Tossed, New Version Filed
Brian Doherty|Aug. 10, 2012 5:47 pm

The lawsuit filed by a Ron Paul grassroots activist lawyer charging the Republican National Committee (RNC) with various shenanigans against Ron Paul delegates and calling for the RNC to admit that no delegate is bound to vote for Romney was dismissed by U.S. District Judge David Carter this week.

Carter's order to dismiss.

Some relevant language from the order explaining why the Judge didn't think the suit worth going forward:

For example, Plaintiffs’ vague reference to “State Bylaws” gives this Court no inkling as to which of the 50 states and which of the millions of pages of bylaws Plaintiffs refer. Similarly, Plaintiffs’ use of the passive voice renders it impossible to discern who broke the bones of whom, who pointed a gun at whom, and whether any of the more than 100 Defendants were even involved. Finally, Plaintiffs’ vague allegations of voting ballot fraud occurring somewhere at sometime and apparently committed simultaneously by all “Defendants” lacks plausibility. While Plaintiffs make an oblique reference to a voting machine somewhere in Arizona, the lack of clarity in this allegation is insufficient to raise it to a level above mere speculation.Thus, this Court does not accept these allegations as true.

I wrote about that suit both right here at Reason and in the New York Times back in June.

The Paul campaign itself never embraced the suit or supported it--though Ron Paul himself didn't choose to condemn it either. Richard Gilbert, the lawyer who filed it, was ferocious in his insistence it was for the good of the delegates, and the honesty of the Republican primary and caucus process.

Finish Reading this Article here!



Delegates vs RNC - ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS