The foolery of being and voting Democrat

Have you ever wondered what the fight "across the aisle was all about? Let me explain it, without hiding the root cause. Our founding Fathers set this country as a Republic, not a Democracy. Let's first look at the definitions for both, then weigh the differences, and conclude with what this country is leaning towards, and what can be done to correct these problems.

Republic - a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.

Democratic - upholding or favouring democracy or the interests of the common people.

The contrast between the to is significant to say they are polar opposites, a republic is governed by the citizens, whereas a Democracy is the government holds the power and dictates what is best for the people, based on a Majority Rule.
This should go to show why our great nations founding fathers started the preamble of the constitution, "We the People," to enable us to stand up to our government, and stop the federal government from encroaching on our rights.

Originally, America allowed only Adults who fulfilled residency requirements, and paid taxes, the right to vote. Our republic should be opposed, to becoming the global champion of Democracy. What a democracy allows is anyone over the age of 18 to vote, this was exactly what our early leaders did not want to happen.

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." – John Adams (1814)

If this is a fact, then where did democracy come from? There are traces as far back as babylon, but it was first introduced in the Roman Empire, and we all know what happened to the Roman Empire, it crumbled. We aren't trying to follow in their footsteps, are we? I know I'm not!

Democrat - a person who believes in the political or social equality of all people.

Republican - an advocate or supporter of a republic.

According to the last two definitions, all Americans ARE republican. Otherwise, those of you who choose to be democrats, are terrorists, whose only objective is to destroy our republic, by getting rid of the constitution. Besides the fact that a democrat is not an advocate of the republic, he/she also DOES NOT support the republic. One can also conclude that democrats aren't the hard-working tax-payers, but are and represent those on welfare.

When I become president I plan to take away the right to vote unless you pay federal income taxes, and I pledge to be a champion of the constitution. As for President Obama, he hasn't repealed the patriot Act, which is unconstitutional, and has quadrupled the national Debt. He shouldn't be re-elected, because he is not a supporter of the republic!

Vote for freedom, elect Mitt Romney, at least he's American!

After "Fort Knox" break-in, U.S. nuclear stockpile security in focus

By Roberta Rampton | Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A shocking security breach at what was supposed to be one of the most secure facilities in the United States has put new attention on a proposal to overhaul the way the government oversees its nuclear laboratories and weapons plants.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives approved a plan to give more flexibility to the contractor-run facilities that make up the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, part of its annual defense policy bill passed in May.

The governance reforms were geared to address a long legacy of cost overruns and overly bureaucratic management highlighted in several bipartisan reports on the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which is part of the Energy Department.

But some critics say the proposals need a second look in the wake of a July break-in at the Y-12 facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, a contractor-run facility built after the September 11, 2001 al Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington, once touted as "the Fort Knox of uranium" because of its security features.

Three aging anti-nuclear activists, including an 82-year-old nun, cut through fences surrounding a facility where highly enriched uranium, a key component of nuclear bombs, is stored. They vandalized its exterior, going unstopped until they walked up to a security guard's car and surrendered.

"It seems to me this is a great case study of the fact that what you want is more government oversight," said Peter Stockton, an investigator with the Project on Government Oversight who has extensively studied nuclear security issues.

Continue Reading

For Liberty Trailer - Let It Not Be Said We Did Nothing

"Let it not be said, that we did nothing!


FOR LIBERTY: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree Of Liberty

A documentary film by Chris Rye & Corey Kealiher

Coming September 2009

Congressman Ron Paul's run for the 2008 GOP Presidential nomination sparked a unique grassroots brush fire not seen in recent history. Ron Paul's integrity inspired and ended the apathy of many, which showed a large remnant of a belief in American liberty lives on.

"Things Are Gonna Change" performed by Todd Hannigan & the Heavy 29s.
Used with permission.
http://www.brotherynstudios.com

Auschwitz the true story by David Cole ( Jew ) ( I am no supporter of Hitler for the record )

Please sub to keep up with all the latest news clips.

Please "Thumb up" even if you don't agree with the point of view but glad that I brought this news to your attention

I am no fan of Hitler but I am a fan of the truth and willing to listen to all truth not just the truths that fit what i want

David Cole in Auschwitz Full Documentary

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Iran slams talk of more sanctions as 'irresponsibl...

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Iran slams talk of more sanctions as 'irresponsibl...: September 09, 2012 09:07 AM By Mohammad Davari TEHRAN: Iran on Sunday hit out at talk of more EU sanctions being applied against it as "...

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Israel 'prepared for 30-day war with Iran'

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Israel 'prepared for 30-day war with Iran': Jonathan Marcus BBC Diplomatic Correspondent Iran has the largest and most diverse ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East Isr...

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Civilized World Must Protect Iran and Consequently...

Oh Zee's Words of Wisdom: Civilized World Must Protect Iran and Consequently...: Civilized World Must Protect Iran and Consequently Itself Just one look at the map will tell you…something ominous is brewing. Iran is ...

Governments asking Google to remove more content

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE | Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — U.S. authorities are leading the charge as governments around the world pepper Google with more demands to remove online content and turn over information about people using its Internet search engine, YouTube video site and other services.

Google Inc. provided a glimpse at the onslaught of government requests in a summary posted on its website late Sunday. The breakdown covers the final six months of last year. It's the fifth time that Google has released a six-month snapshot of government requests since the company engaged in a high-profile battle over online censorship with China's communist leadership in 2010.

The country-by-country capsule illustrates the pressure Google faces as it tries to obey the disparate laws in various countries while trying to uphold its commitment to free expression and protect the sanctity its more than 1 billion users' personal information.

Governments zero in on Google because its services have become staples of our digital-driven lives. Besides running the Internet's most dominant search engine, Google owns the most watched video site in YouTube, operates widely used blogging and email services and distributes Android, the top operating system on mobile phones. During the past year, Google has focused on expanding Plus, a social networking service, that boasts more than 170 million users.

Many of the requests are legitimate attempts to enforce laws governing hot-button issues ranging from personal privacy to hate speech.

But Google says it increasingly fields requests from government agencies trying to use their power to suppress political opinions and other material they don't like.

"It's alarming not only because free expression is at risk, but because some of these requests come from countries you might not suspect — Western democracies not typically associated with censorship," Dorothy Chou, Google's senior policy analyst, wrote in a Sunday blog post.

That comment may have been aimed at the U.S., where police prosecutors, courts and other government agencies submitted 187 requests to remove content from July through December last year, more than doubling from 92 requests from January through June.

Only Brazil's government agencies submitted more content removal requests with a total of 194 during the final half of last year. But that figure was down from 224 requests in Brazil during the first half of the year.

Brazil's requests covered a more narrow range of content than the U.S. demands. The submissions from Brazil covered 554 different pieces of content while the U.S. requests sought to censor nearly 6,200 items.

Google usually gets a lot of removal requests from Brazil because it runs a 8-year-old social network called Orkut that is a popular forum in that country. Orkut gets so little usage in most other countries that Google took another stab at social networking by creating Plus last year.

The U.S. requests included 117 court orders, including one that instructed Google to remove 218 search results linking to websites containing content alleged to be defamatory. Google said it censored about 25 percent of the search results covered in that court order.

This report marks the first time that Google has quantified how many of the removal requests came through court orders.

Google wound up at least partially complying with 42 percent of the content removal requests in the U.S. and 54 percent in the Brazil.

Other governments frequently reaching out to Google included Germany (103 content-removal requests, down 18 percent from the previous six-month period), and India (101 requests, a 49 percent increase).



At least four countries — Bolivia, the Czech Republic, Jordan and Ukraine — asked Google to remove content for the first time during the final six months of last year.

Google's censorship report doesn't include China and Iran because those countries deploy filters to block content that their governments have deemed objectionable.

Governments also are leaning Google more frequently for information about people suspected of breaking the law or engaging in other mischief.

The U.S. government filed 6,321 requests with Google for user data during the final six months of the year. That was far more than any other country, according to Google, and a 6 percent increase from the previous six months. Google complied with 93 percent of the U.S. requests for user data, encompassing more than 12,200 accounts.

U.S. authorities lodge some of the user data requests on behalf of other countries covered by legal assistance agreements and other rules of cooperation.

India accounted for the second highest volume of user data requests with 2,207, a 27 percent increase from the previous six-month period. Google complied with two-thirds of India's requests, which targeted more than 3,400 Google users.

All told, Google received a more than 18,250 requests for user data during the final six months of last year, a 16 percent increase from the first half of the year.
___
Online: