Illegal Cover-up: Obama Changing Names Of Benghazi Survivors - YouTube

Illegal Cover-up: Obama Changing Names Of Benghazi Survivors - YouTube: ""

'via Blog this'

Sell Music online at ReverbNation.com

CNBC admits We're all SLAVES to CENTRAL BANKERS Bankers Declare U.S. & Europe Conquered

sec: "Do we all work for Central Bankers? Is this Global Governance at last? Is it One World.. with the Central Bankers in charge?"
1 min: "To answer your question: We are absolutely slave to Central Banks"
1 min 16sec: "Markets are driven by policy now, they're not driven by market forces"
1 min 26 sec: "Fiat currency thats continually watered down.. so the markets go up and we feel good about it"
2min 25 sec: "We are basically beholden to Central Bankers"
2min 30sec: "..admits (Federal Reserve) are debasing currency and borrowing our way to false prosperity"
2min 48sec: "Every Central Bank in the world has to devalue their currency"
3min 28sec: "Free markets will fight back and ultimately they'll win"

The truth is out there, we just need to look for it!

Dear Gregory,

As Ben Franklin stated, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Sadly, the statists in Washington, D.C. keep choosing to take away more and more of our liberties for some bureaucrat's vision of so-called "safety."

In today's world, "security" really means handing over the last bits of freedom to Big Government's prying eyes.

Just recently, the Senate Armed Services Committee called for drones returning from Afghanistan to be used "freely and routinely" in U.S. airspace.

Government agencies are training drones by tracking civilian cars over American cities.

Law enforcement agencies are buying them up by the dozen – happy to let the spying begin.

The Congressional Research Service states domestic drones could be equipped "with facial recognition or soft biometric recognition, which can recognize and track individuals based on attributes such as height, age, gender, and skin color."

More than 30,000 are expected to be flying across the United States in the near future.

This isn't something out of George Orwell's 1984. It's America in 2012.

And it's all designed so politicians can line the pockets of their crony capitalist pals – while you and I pay the price with our tax dollars and our freedom.

I'm not telling you all this to dishearten you – although I understand it may be discouraging to look the facts straight in the face.

I'm telling you this because these are the battles you and I can't ignore if we are going to maintain our last vestiges of freedom as Americans – and regain what we've lost.

After all, in recent years, we've witnessed the passage of the so-called "Patriot" Act, which allows the government to wiretap and spy on American citizens.

We've seen the passage of the NDAA - allowing the government to lock up and detain American citizens indefinitely without so much as a warrant.

And we see the TSA routinely groping elderly women and children at airports.

Ten years after its creation, a congressional report was issued saying the TSA was "bloated and ineffective."

More than 25,000 security breaches have occurred under its watch.

Our liberties are being stolen from us daily – and for NOTHING.

So what's next? What else will the security statists demand of us in order to finally make us "safe and secure"?

"Black boxes" in every car?

Cameras on every street corner? In every house?

RFID tracking chips implanted in every man, woman, and child – all designed to ensure we're "safe"?

So government bureaucrats can ensure we don't smoke the wrong thing?

To ensure our sodas aren't too big or our cheeseburgers too greasy?

How much liberty will politicians steal before the American people wake up and say "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!"?

I believe you and I are at a tipping point.

More and more Americans ARE getting fed up.

Senator Rand Paul has already introduced legislation to get the out-of-control TSA screeners out of our airports.

And he recently introduced a bill that would stop the government from arbitrarily using drones to spy on Americans by forcing it to obey the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But more attacks on our Fourth Amendment rights are coming at the American people full-speed ahead.

It's up to you and me to stop them.

You and I must be prepared to take on the statists and defend our freedoms.

That's exactly what Campaign for Liberty has been doing - and will continue to do - in the coming weeks and months.

Our goal is to reawaken men and women from coast to coast and rally them to defend liberty before it's too late.

Because it's not too late.

Not yet.

The free soul of America still exists.

But it's up to you and me to create a grassroots fire that no politician in his or her right mind would dare ignore.

In Liberty,


John Tate
President

P.S. The Big Government statists are wasting no time further eroding our Fourth Amendment rights.

America: Reasons why Ron Paul deserves your vote!

The following comments are collected from various news sites, including the NY Times, yahoo news, cnn, and several other sites. Please read as many as possible, before you cast any judgement on the last American running for president.

jason shaw from houston, tx

Lets make this easy - How many politicians actually follow their own rhetoric once elected?

This is why Ron Paul scares the establishment, he wont go back on his campaign promises, ever! Dont let the media spin their version of the gold standard or other issues, listen to Ron Paul speak about these issues if you want to understand.

Its very easy to tell an uninformed Paul Hater from people who are knowledgeable on his issues but dont agree with him. I dont see many of the later posting in these comments, hats off to Chris L. for listening to what the man has to say.

BidNo from Dallas, TX

The Republican and Democratic parties no longer represent the American people -- both have been captured by corporate and moneyed interests. And crony capitalism reigns in American.

Ron Paul and supporters should leave the Republican Party and join with Progressives on the GREEN PARTY ticket. We MUST RECLAIM GOVERNMENT FOR THE PEOPLE. There is more synergy, commonality and opportunity for compromise between Libertarians and Progressives than in either of the parties controlled by MONEY.

Let's do this. Let's provide a REAL CHOICE and REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT for the American people.
Sept. 4, 2012 at 7:48 a.m.

William Dalton from Burlington NC

The presence of Barack Obama in the White House may have made it easier for Republicans in Congress to side with protests of Administration war and monetary policy, but it had no effect on Paulites in the body politic.

We were with him when Dr. Paul was denouncing the policies of GW Bush just as unabashedly. These years of seeing Ron Paul's predictions of failed wars and stimulus spending come true have added to our number, not the occupant of the White House. If Romney persists in the most repugnant of Barack Obama policies, or even doubles down on them, as he gives every indication of doing, our rejection of him will be even sharper.

After all, we expect more of a Republican, and, we have been spending the better part of the last year belaboring our less astute party members that a Romney Administration will not be much improvement over Obama's. You don't think we'll give up the opportunity of saying, "We told you so!", do you?


Dead Serious from Somewhere

To correct Donald Quixote here, Ron Paul's three big ideas are:

1. Strict adherence to rule of law (the Constitution).

2. No undeclared wars or "hostilities" in foreign countries.

3. Common sense economic policy (no overspending, no monopolies, no pricefixing).

Other than that, read his election platform. It pretty much reflects everything what and who he is.

christopher glidden from farmington nh

Watch this and understand why we need his ideas. http://www.documentary24.com/this-is-how-our-money-system-works--86/

Christopher London from New York, New York

Mr. Douthat makes some cogent points. And for all the critics of the NY Times, it ought to tell you a great deal more about the earnest character of the journalism provided on these pages. A society without a news source with the breadth and character of the NY Times, will simply perish.

Ron Paul has gotten a fair shake from pockets of America's intelligentsia because Ron Paul the man has presented himself, his ideas in a forthright and deliberate fashion and made those ideas center stage, not his ego. You have no choice but to respect Mr. Paul regardless of whether you are inclined at first to side with him or not.

Even as a currently Registered Democrat, I respect Ron Paul for coming forth with a rare degree of candor and integrity about the agenda that he represents. Paul patiently, rationally and deliberately makes the case for Liberty and it forces you to reconsider the America that once was, that you live in currently and what it might still yet become. I am proud to live in a country where Ron Paul is a citizen.

John B from Austin, TX

lib·er·ty (lbr-t)
n. pl. lib·er·ties
1.
a. The condition of being free from restriction or control.
b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.
c. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. See Synonyms at freedom.

2. Freedom from unjust or undue governmental control.

3. A right or immunity to engage in certain actions without control or interference: the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.

Do you believe in Liberty? You may be a US citizen, but if you don't believe in Liberty, can you really call yourself an American? Is not Liberty to very idea of America?

Republican conservatives open “third” convention at Values Voters Summit

The Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins speaks at last year’s Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C. The Summit showcases conservative leaders and is sometimes a focal point of controversy. (Photo courtesy Gage Skidmore/flickr / UW Election Eye).

Posted by Will Mari

Washington, D.C. — Some might say the Republican Party will have experienced three conventions this year.

First, there was the mini-convention for Ron Paul and his people the weekend before the actual GOP convention last month in Tampa, Fla. UW Election Eye has encountered fervent Paul partisans all around the country, and they have been a very motivated bunch in their sometimes-quixotic libertarian quest for their man’s nomination.

The rally in Florida was a chance for them to vent some of their frustration at the process, some of which spilled over at the ”big-tent” convention itself. But normally these are occasions in which disparate groups, as at all political-party gatherings, have to play well together, or appear to. As my colleagues showed in their coverage of the Democrats’ convention last week in Charlotte, S.C. they’re about presenting united fronts and compromising for the sake of potential victory.

But then there’s the Values Voter Summit. It’s not about party unity. It’s instead the go-to protest space for social conservatives. Primarily hosted by the Family Research Council, it’s been the place for disenchanted socially conservative “values voters” — those worried about the impact of the recent HHS mandate on faith-based non-profits, abortion and same-sex marriage — to make their collective voice heard. That sometimes includes odd, but still telling, straw-poll winners in off-years. And if Mitt Romney loses the nomination, it’ll probably only grow in importance as a magnet for those politicians wanting to appeal to conservative activists.

Paul Ryan, Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Jim DeMint, and Michelle Bachmann, among others, are slated to speak this year.

to finish reading this article, click here!

My City in Ruins: Stockton CA, a nuisance to its citizens

This once great city has lost its touch, well at least the city officials have lost theirs. Our elected officials, besides Dale Fritchen, have all adopted a form of government that is spreading quick; tyranny. This type of governing isn't known in the Western world, we call it democracy. I live in Stockton, California, "The most miserable city in America," according to Forbes magazine anyways. In my opinion, its the most "diverse" city in the world, in the way it suffers from a mixture of problems.

Yesterday I received a Letter from the City of Stockton informing me of multiple code violations, and it asks me to correct these violations, and I will, but only after the city corrects their issues. For example, the city's budget has resulted in a negative ending balance for the last four years. Plus Stockton is atop of the nation's murder count, when looked at murders per person. To fix the budget problem the city laid off several police officers, which ultimately had an adverse effect on violent crime.

How, or better yet, why is it that the city can tell me to fix up my yard, or they'll hire contractors to correct the mentioned violations? But when the citizens have pleaded with the city council to avoid bankruptcy by accepting a donation, they simply refused. This city has issues too big for one man to fix, but it only takes one man to place the city back on track, and heading in the right direction. Based on the fact that our council members' disregard for the safety of the citizens, we should show our power in numbers, and express how we will not tolerate their incapacity to manage our city properly.

This is probably because of the suit I filed against the city of stockton, and our mayor, Ann Johnston, dealing with the City charters ambiguous wording which states that she (Ann Johnston) has already termed out, and cannot run again. If they do not have to follow their own laws and regulations, what makes them think the citizens will? I don't take orders from people that don't live up to their own codes of conduct. For many of us who live here, our homes are worth 25% of what they were in 2007, we have little to no income, and we can barely afford to eat, and the city wants to fine us $200-$500 for not maintaining our yards. It's time for them to fix their own problems, otherwise the time-is-up for the incumbents, and we will elect their opposition.

As a way of standing my ground I will pursue some help from local news agency's that are paid to not expose the corruption, and hope to get more citizens to rebel against their code violations, until our city has corrected its own issues. I am willing to do my part, but I want to make sure the people understand why I haven't done so yet. I will not live in a city which is known for its negative impact on society, and I'm not moving until I feel that it's safe again. LET'S TAKE OUR CITY BACK!